<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cooley?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://timcooley.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://timcooley.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like arguing about ideas. Your premise is founded upon your incapability or unwillingness to appreciate the information provided by secondary sources on sheer grounds that they are in themselves not primary sources. But you are mistaken to assume the premise. I did not present the link http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html as incontestable proof of any sort but as reference to Biblical passages which can then be checked against the LC. In the same way are English translations of the Bible secondary interpretations of an older text, but they are in themselves, to varying degrees of accuracy, representations of their direct antecedents, and so cannot be easily disregarded on grounds of being secondary alone. In any case, I believe you will find that looking up said passages in the LC in hope of a saner humanity can and will only leave much to be desired.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like arguing about ideas. Your premise is founded upon your incapability or unwillingness to appreciate the information provided by secondary sources on sheer grounds that they are in themselves not primary sources. But you are mistaken to assume the premise. I did not present the link <a href="http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html</a> as incontestable proof of any sort but as reference to Biblical passages which can then be checked against the LC. In the same way are English translations of the Bible secondary interpretations of an older text, but they are in themselves, to varying degrees of accuracy, representations of their direct antecedents, and so cannot be easily disregarded on grounds of being secondary alone. In any case, I believe you will find that looking up said passages in the LC in hope of a saner humanity can and will only leave much to be desired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by tobeforgiven</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobeforgiven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, I think you misunderstood what I mean by &quot;Source material&quot;. 
First, off someone quoting he Bible is not &quot;Source Material.&quot;
It can also be said that our modern English Bibles (though I don&#039;t agree per se) are not source material.

The link I gave you is not just another version of the Bible, but the Lenningrad Codex, which is the oldest known complete Hebrew Text of the OT.

It is supported by the earliest known copies of the Septuagint and the Qumron scrolls. 

That is what I mean by source!

If you go beyond the first few google links, you will find a wealth of real knowledge beyond other people&#039;s blogs. 

You have argued against my &quot;Wherewithall&quot; my &quot;personal adgenda&quot; and morality. 
But, as these kind of arguments are about ideas. I am waiting for you to disagree with my premise. My premise being that the material you provided as proof is not proof compared to the actual Hebrew text of the Bible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I think you misunderstood what I mean by &#8220;Source material&#8221;.<br />
First, off someone quoting he Bible is not &#8220;Source Material.&#8221;<br />
It can also be said that our modern English Bibles (though I don&#8217;t agree per se) are not source material.</p>
<p>The link I gave you is not just another version of the Bible, but the Lenningrad Codex, which is the oldest known complete Hebrew Text of the OT.</p>
<p>It is supported by the earliest known copies of the Septuagint and the Qumron scrolls. </p>
<p>That is what I mean by source!</p>
<p>If you go beyond the first few google links, you will find a wealth of real knowledge beyond other people&#8217;s blogs. </p>
<p>You have argued against my &#8220;Wherewithall&#8221; my &#8220;personal adgenda&#8221; and morality.<br />
But, as these kind of arguments are about ideas. I am waiting for you to disagree with my premise. My premise being that the material you provided as proof is not proof compared to the actual Hebrew text of the Bible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3118</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 03:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I assumed you had the wherewithal to realise that the link I supplied contained direct references to biblical passages re: slavery, and that you are at all times invited to look them up in your preferred version or translation of the text if you so desire. Clearly, I assumed incorrectly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assumed you had the wherewithal to realise that the link I supplied contained direct references to biblical passages re: slavery, and that you are at all times invited to look them up in your preferred version or translation of the text if you so desire. Clearly, I assumed incorrectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by tobeforgiven</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobeforgiven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not stated my agenda. I am, as you can imagine, a Christian. 
I cannot defend something, (ie scriptures) until you argue from scriptures. 

The only thing I am defending is academic integrity. 
Which is why I have asked you some questions that should challenge us to go deeper, and thus discover truth in deeper sense. 

When we accept truth at the surface level, that is when we accept truth as per wiki and bloggers. 
When we go deeper to discover real truth we go to source material, such as the one I gave you. 

You made the comment that &quot;by your understanding...&quot;. It should never stop there. Our own understanding is often flawed. 

So we use Cartusian Doubt, in that we doubt our understanding, argue it, research it, then strengthen or change it completely. 

I was trying to get you to look at the source, as a way of doing this. 
I do not understand why so many Atheists are afraid to do this. 
It is the same as Christians who are afraid to read &quot;Origin of Species&quot;. 

Also, am I defending slavery? How so?

I also think that answering the question &quot;how do you know your sources are reliable?&quot; might be a good discussion. 

However, if things go as they usually do, your probably not willing to answer those questions.

I would like to get to point where you can prove me wrong. 
But not many are willing to have those deeper conversations.

But it is in those conversations, and only in those conversations with people with differing agendas that we learn.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not stated my agenda. I am, as you can imagine, a Christian.<br />
I cannot defend something, (ie scriptures) until you argue from scriptures. </p>
<p>The only thing I am defending is academic integrity.<br />
Which is why I have asked you some questions that should challenge us to go deeper, and thus discover truth in deeper sense. </p>
<p>When we accept truth at the surface level, that is when we accept truth as per wiki and bloggers.<br />
When we go deeper to discover real truth we go to source material, such as the one I gave you. </p>
<p>You made the comment that &#8220;by your understanding&#8230;&#8221;. It should never stop there. Our own understanding is often flawed. </p>
<p>So we use Cartusian Doubt, in that we doubt our understanding, argue it, research it, then strengthen or change it completely. </p>
<p>I was trying to get you to look at the source, as a way of doing this.<br />
I do not understand why so many Atheists are afraid to do this.<br />
It is the same as Christians who are afraid to read &#8220;Origin of Species&#8221;. </p>
<p>Also, am I defending slavery? How so?</p>
<p>I also think that answering the question &#8220;how do you know your sources are reliable?&#8221; might be a good discussion. </p>
<p>However, if things go as they usually do, your probably not willing to answer those questions.</p>
<p>I would like to get to point where you can prove me wrong.<br />
But not many are willing to have those deeper conversations.</p>
<p>But it is in those conversations, and only in those conversations with people with differing agendas that we learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason why I do not see any opportunity here for rational discourse (and have therefore, admittedly, been avoiding it) is because I am fully aware of your personal agenda and it is clear to me that so long as you go out of your way to defend slavery (or call it whatever you like) the point I made in the article above will always hold true. In no context, &quot;slavery&quot; and the toned-down version of &quot;indentured servitude&quot; alike, are passages as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/exo21.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Exodus 21:20-21&lt;/a&gt; ever justifiable, morally. Your shameless vigour to defend scripture at all cost only goes to confirm my original observation that the faithful in general are happy to indulge in outdated moral values, so long as their religion permits it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why I do not see any opportunity here for rational discourse (and have therefore, admittedly, been avoiding it) is because I am fully aware of your personal agenda and it is clear to me that so long as you go out of your way to defend slavery (or call it whatever you like) the point I made in the article above will always hold true. In no context, &#8220;slavery&#8221; and the toned-down version of &#8220;indentured servitude&#8221; alike, are passages as <a href="http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/exo21.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Exodus 21:20-21</a> ever justifiable, morally. Your shameless vigour to defend scripture at all cost only goes to confirm my original observation that the faithful in general are happy to indulge in outdated moral values, so long as their religion permits it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by tobeforgiven</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobeforgiven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you know the sources you cite are correct?

You could indeed, go to an apologetics blog etc. 

But are you really saying that a source text is inferior to bloggers?

I recently read another blogger who stated that the original text said slave (refering to Exodus 20) but it had been changed to become more acceptable in time. 
I gave this person the actual text, which uses the word for maid-servant, rather than the Hebrew Eh-ved which is the specific word for slave. 

He deleted it, saying it was BS, then he cited, an atheist blogger who told him that what he said was true. With out ever checking the source.

Go to sources not bloggers. Although these bloggers are correct in many ways. What I am trying to do is to encourage both atheists and believers to stop using secondary sources and actually read what they are talking about. 

Not many are willing to do so.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you know the sources you cite are correct?</p>
<p>You could indeed, go to an apologetics blog etc. </p>
<p>But are you really saying that a source text is inferior to bloggers?</p>
<p>I recently read another blogger who stated that the original text said slave (refering to Exodus 20) but it had been changed to become more acceptable in time.<br />
I gave this person the actual text, which uses the word for maid-servant, rather than the Hebrew Eh-ved which is the specific word for slave. </p>
<p>He deleted it, saying it was BS, then he cited, an atheist blogger who told him that what he said was true. With out ever checking the source.</p>
<p>Go to sources not bloggers. Although these bloggers are correct in many ways. What I am trying to do is to encourage both atheists and believers to stop using secondary sources and actually read what they are talking about. </p>
<p>Not many are willing to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3114</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is clear to me what slavery entails in the Old Testament:
http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html

Needless to say, your arguments would fare better on an apologetic site.
http://veritasmizzou.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/slavery-in-the-old-testament/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is clear to me what slavery entails in the Old Testament:<br />
<a href="http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rationalchristianity.net/slavery_ot.html</a></p>
<p>Needless to say, your arguments would fare better on an apologetic site.<br />
<a href="http://veritasmizzou.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/slavery-in-the-old-testament/" rel="nofollow">http://veritasmizzou.wordpress.com/2011/08/02/slavery-in-the-old-testament/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by tobeforgiven</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobeforgiven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 04:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok so your using Old Testament passages.
How do you know they are talking about slavery in context of our modern understanding of slavery?

Also, if you are going to say what scripture says, go to the source. This link is to the Lenningrad Codex. The oldest complete OT Hebrew Text. 

http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Hebrew_Index.htm]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so your using Old Testament passages.<br />
How do you know they are talking about slavery in context of our modern understanding of slavery?</p>
<p>Also, if you are going to say what scripture says, go to the source. This link is to the Lenningrad Codex. The oldest complete OT Hebrew Text. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Hebrew_Index.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/Hebrew_Index.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by Tim</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 00:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;What is the moral scale you are using, and what is its source?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Clue is in the title.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Also, in context, please give me the verses you claim to be a condonation of slavery from the New Testament.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was actually referring to the Old Testament, but to my understanding Jesus did not outright condemn it either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8220;What is the moral scale you are using, and what is its source?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Clue is in the title.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Also, in context, please give me the verses you claim to be a condonation of slavery from the New Testament.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I was actually referring to the Old Testament, but to my understanding Jesus did not outright condemn it either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism by tobeforgiven</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/13/tailor-made-christianity-vs-moral-eclecticism/#comment-3106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tobeforgiven]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 22:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5104#comment-3106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is the moral scale you are using, and what is its source?

Also, in context, please give me the verses you claim to be a condonation of slavery from the New Testament. 

Also, I would encourage you to do a word study on the NT source word for slavery.

Or to study the New Testament Condonation of Genocide. 

(I am focusing on the New Testament because your claims address Jesus.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the moral scale you are using, and what is its source?</p>
<p>Also, in context, please give me the verses you claim to be a condonation of slavery from the New Testament. </p>
<p>Also, I would encourage you to do a word study on the NT source word for slavery.</p>
<p>Or to study the New Testament Condonation of Genocide. </p>
<p>(I am focusing on the New Testament because your claims address Jesus.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why I am not a Christian by Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism &#171; Cooley?</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/05/10/why-i-am-not-a-christian/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tailor-made Christianity vs. Moral Eclecticism &#171; Cooley?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 03:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=5092#comment-3105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Christianity vs. Moral&#160;Eclecticism   May 13, 2012   Re: Why I am not a Christian. At the risk of having broad-brushed Christians into one manageable stereotype, allow me to state [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christianity vs. Moral&nbsp;Eclecticism   May 13, 2012   Re: Why I am not a Christian. At the risk of having broad-brushed Christians into one manageable stereotype, allow me to state [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ken Miller corrects creationist sticker. by Ciencia en el Midwest – El estado de las cosas &#124; SapienScientia</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/03/17/ken-miller-corrects-creationist-sticker/#comment-3100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ciencia en el Midwest – El estado de las cosas &#124; SapienScientia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 13:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=2048#comment-3100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] en la sociedad de a pie se hace notar: los libros de texto suelen incluir “disclaimers” (como este) en las lecciones de ‘Heredity and Evolution’, indicando que la palabra teoría puede [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en la sociedad de a pie se hace notar: los libros de texto suelen incluir “disclaimers” (como este) en las lecciones de ‘Heredity and Evolution’, indicando que la palabra teoría puede [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Homeschooling is evil. by people_need_to_know</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/01/13/homeschooling-is-evil/#comment-3096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[people_need_to_know]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 02:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=1153#comment-3096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i was home schooled until high school... i was accelerated in my program and enrolled in a public high school at the age of 12... yes, i performed above average... and yes, i&#039;m still trying to fix what it did to me developmentally (social development and psychological impact)

i believe that homeschooling should only be considered in extreme circumstances. For example, mental disability of the child, children with compromising illnesses, or other unique situations in which the child will not function normally in a public learning environment 

please understand, noting my perspective, that in MANY cases (not all) homeschooling severely deprives children of proper social development... 

whenever i questioned home schooling as a child, my mother basically lied to me/deceived me into thinking that it was not only no different from traditional, public, schooling, but that public schooling was somehow &quot;evil&quot;. in fact, when i mis-behaved she would often threaten to send me to public school the following year as punishment for my actions. she is very religious... and i am not... but i was trapped. that&#039;s the best way i can put it... what is a child going to do? parents have the authority, and in my case, the ability to lie to and manipulate their children into a false sense of reality

the only reason i am taking the time to post this, is because of the impact it has had on my life... i am now 23 years old... its been 12 years since homeschooling and i&#039;m still feeling the ramifications]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was home schooled until high school&#8230; i was accelerated in my program and enrolled in a public high school at the age of 12&#8230; yes, i performed above average&#8230; and yes, i&#8217;m still trying to fix what it did to me developmentally (social development and psychological impact)</p>
<p>i believe that homeschooling should only be considered in extreme circumstances. For example, mental disability of the child, children with compromising illnesses, or other unique situations in which the child will not function normally in a public learning environment </p>
<p>please understand, noting my perspective, that in MANY cases (not all) homeschooling severely deprives children of proper social development&#8230; </p>
<p>whenever i questioned home schooling as a child, my mother basically lied to me/deceived me into thinking that it was not only no different from traditional, public, schooling, but that public schooling was somehow &#8220;evil&#8221;. in fact, when i mis-behaved she would often threaten to send me to public school the following year as punishment for my actions. she is very religious&#8230; and i am not&#8230; but i was trapped. that&#8217;s the best way i can put it&#8230; what is a child going to do? parents have the authority, and in my case, the ability to lie to and manipulate their children into a false sense of reality</p>
<p>the only reason i am taking the time to post this, is because of the impact it has had on my life&#8230; i am now 23 years old&#8230; its been 12 years since homeschooling and i&#8217;m still feeling the ramifications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheism, in a nutshell (apparently) by beaky</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/04/13/atheism-in-a-nutshell-apparently/#comment-3091</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[beaky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=2471#comment-3091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[every one here needs to take a step back and SERIOUSLY READ their comments because your all complete fuckin morons.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>every one here needs to take a step back and SERIOUSLY READ their comments because your all complete fuckin morons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Practical Applications of the Bible by bro O</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/05/26/practical-applications-of-the-bible/#comment-3087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bro O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=3260#comment-3087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[God sends you the greatest love letter ever written about His Son dieing for your sins
so that you can have the gift of eternal life and thats the best you can do?

God have mercy on you.  Read the Bible to obtain wisdom.  you need it, bad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God sends you the greatest love letter ever written about His Son dieing for your sins<br />
so that you can have the gift of eternal life and thats the best you can do?</p>
<p>God have mercy on you.  Read the Bible to obtain wisdom.  you need it, bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Atheism, in a nutshell (apparently) by cebuboy</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/04/13/atheism-in-a-nutshell-apparently/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cebuboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=2471#comment-3081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree. And if you also believe that atheists use it as an excuse to rape murder and all the rest then you are misled. Read through your bible and see how much rape and murder is in it. Lastly if you look through history, many wars were fought because of, wait for it..., religion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. And if you also believe that atheists use it as an excuse to rape murder and all the rest then you are misled. Read through your bible and see how much rape and murder is in it. Lastly if you look through history, many wars were fought because of, wait for it&#8230;, religion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Religious Miracles by diny</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2009/12/18/religious-miracles/#comment-3047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[diny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 04:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=593#comment-3047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the science part of buddhist relic doesnt make it as fake or superstitious. it shows the practice of the monks that can cause such phenomenon. miracle or not, it is subjective. but there is no reason to laugh at it or to call it fake.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the science part of buddhist relic doesnt make it as fake or superstitious. it shows the practice of the monks that can cause such phenomenon. miracle or not, it is subjective. but there is no reason to laugh at it or to call it fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Zeus exist: A scientific inquiry by Venus Castina</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/03/30/does-zeus-exist-a-scientific-inquiry/#comment-3045</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Venus Castina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.wordpress.com/?p=2299#comment-3045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you all approaching the whole matter trespassing the wrong way.
If you read Kosmogonia by Isiodos or Orpheas, you will realize how real all these could be.
Of course its not really necessary to think gods like something spiritual. But something superior? Oh yes.

Hint: the word mythology doesnt means something unreal. In greeks means the description of a fact.

PS Sorry for my english, its not my native language, Im greek.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you all approaching the whole matter trespassing the wrong way.<br />
If you read Kosmogonia by Isiodos or Orpheas, you will realize how real all these could be.<br />
Of course its not really necessary to think gods like something spiritual. But something superior? Oh yes.</p>
<p>Hint: the word mythology doesnt means something unreal. In greeks means the description of a fact.</p>
<p>PS Sorry for my english, its not my native language, Im greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aroma pleasing to the Lord&#8230; by Nelson</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2010/05/02/aroma-pleasing-to-the-lord/#comment-3032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=2924#comment-3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tim
1.  Show where in the Genesis account it says that Yahweh killed animals to make clothes for Adam and Eve?

Gen 3:21 - 21 The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. 22 And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” 23 So the LORD God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. 24 After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side[e] of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.

2.  The fact that your God requires a blood sacrifice and finds the aroma of burnt flesh pleasing shows the sadistic nature of your deity and those that follow him.  There are plenty of religions that require a blood sacrifice, yet do not find it appleaing..  Your text book, apologetic answer is lacking.

@Matthew

ever smelled burning flesh.  with hair and all.  Not pleasant.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tim<br />
1.  Show where in the Genesis account it says that Yahweh killed animals to make clothes for Adam and Eve?</p>
<p>Gen 3:21 &#8211; 21 The LORD God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them. 22 And the LORD God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.” 23 So the LORD God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken. 24 After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side[e] of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.</p>
<p>2.  The fact that your God requires a blood sacrifice and finds the aroma of burnt flesh pleasing shows the sadistic nature of your deity and those that follow him.  There are plenty of religions that require a blood sacrifice, yet do not find it appleaing..  Your text book, apologetic answer is lacking.</p>
<p>@Matthew</p>
<p>ever smelled burning flesh.  with hair and all.  Not pleasant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KONY 2012 by bradley</title>
		<link>http://timcooley.net/2012/03/08/kony-2012/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 04:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://timcooley.net/?p=4952#comment-3009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah... and the saddest part is large groups of kids shouting repeated statements is sooooo 2011. It was borderline cool last year... look... they even put their fists in the air like a bunch of useful idiots

kid #1: &quot;quick hurry I need something to rage against the machine... like everybody&#039;s doing it and, like, I want to be relevant&quot;. 

kid #2: &quot;oh dude, there&#039;s this kony2012 thing. I think its some rapper from africa that&#039;s running for president. He said he&#039;ll give us a bunch of stuff and and rich people eat children... plus their rally t-shirt will look totally awesome with some new jeans I just got for my birthday, brah&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah&#8230; and the saddest part is large groups of kids shouting repeated statements is sooooo 2011. It was borderline cool last year&#8230; look&#8230; they even put their fists in the air like a bunch of useful idiots</p>
<p>kid #1: &#8220;quick hurry I need something to rage against the machine&#8230; like everybody&#8217;s doing it and, like, I want to be relevant&#8221;. </p>
<p>kid #2: &#8220;oh dude, there&#8217;s this kony2012 thing. I think its some rapper from africa that&#8217;s running for president. He said he&#8217;ll give us a bunch of stuff and and rich people eat children&#8230; plus their rally t-shirt will look totally awesome with some new jeans I just got for my birthday, brah&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

